Test Report
Testing Scope
The scope of testing is to verify fitment to the specification from the perspective of
● Functionality
● Deployability
● Configurability
● Customizability
Verification is performed not only from the end user perspective but also from the System Integrator (SI) point of view. Hence Configurability and Extensibility of the software is also assessed. This ensures readiness of software for use in multiple countries. Since MOSIP is an “API First” product platform, Verification scope required comprehensive automation testing for all the MOSIP APIs. An automation Test Rig is created for the same.
Test Approach
Persona based approach has been adopted to perform the IV&V, by simulating test scenarios that resemble a real-time implementation.
A Persona is a fictional character/user profile created to represent a user type that might use a product/or a service in a similar way. Persona based testing is a software testing technique that puts software testers in the customer's shoes, assesses their needs from the software and thereby determines use cases/scenarios that the customers will execute. The persona needs may be addressed through any of the following:
● Functionality
● Deployability
● Configurability
● Customizability
The verification methods may differ based on how the need was addressed.
For regression check, “MOSIP Test Rig” - an automation testing suite - which is indigenously designed and developed for supporting persona based testing. MOSIP Test Rig covers the end to end test execution and reporting. The end to end functional test scenarios are written starting from pre-registration, to creation of packet in registration center, processing the packet through the registration processor, generating UIN and authenticating identity using IDA through various permutation and combinations of cases being covered. MOSIP Test Rig will be an open source artifact which can also be enhanced and used by countries to validate the SI deliveries before going live. Persona classes include both negative and positive personas. Negative persona classes include users like Bribed Registration Office, Malicious Insider etc. The needs of positive persona classes must be met, whereas the needs of negative persona classes must be effectively restricted by the software.
Verified configuration
Verification is performed on various configurations as mentioned below :
▪ Default configuration - with 3 Languages (English/Arabic/French)
Main features tested:
Performed sanity testing and bug verification across the following modules: PreReg, Admin, RegClient, RegProc, IDRepo, IDA, and Resident.
Test execution statistics
Automation test results
Below are the test metrics by performing functional testing using mock MDS, mock Auth and mock ABIS. The process followed was black box testing which based its test cases on the specifications of the software component under test. Functional test was performed in combination of individual module testing as well as integration testing. Test data were prepared inline with the user stories. Expected results were monitored by examining the user interface. The coverage includes System testing, End-To-End flows across multiple languages and configurations. The testing cycle included simulation of multiple identity schema and respective UI schema configurations.
Here is the detailed breakdown:
Module
Total
Passed
Failed
Skipped
Ignored
Known issues
PreReg
288
277
0
0
2
9
Master Data (Eng)
945
923
0
0
0
22
Master Data (Ara)
945
896
0
0
15
34
Master Data (Fra)
945
907
0
0
15
23
IDRepo
414
316
0
0
78
20
IDA
612
591
0
0
5
16
Resident
1142
1130
0
0
0
12
DSL - End to end scenarios results:
End to end scenarios
Total
204
Pass
165
Fail
0
Skipped
0
Ignored
12
Known issues
27
Click here to refer the full test report
Last updated
Was this helpful?