Reactivation of Deactivated National ID
When Does It Happen?
This scenario occurs in rare cases when a National ID has been deactivated following a fraud-birth verification (see Section 4.6.1), but CRVS or country authorities later determine that the original deactivation decision was incorrect or unjustified.
Triggers:
Discovery that the fraud claim was erroneous
New evidence proving the birth registration was legitimate
Administrative error correction after review
Legal reversal of the deactivation decision
Why This Scenario is Sensitive:
Original deactivation involved thorough verification by country authorities
Automatic reactivation could bypass legal and administrative safeguards
Multiple reactivation/deactivation cycles could compromise system integrity
Downstream services (banking, benefits, authentication) may be affected
Risk of operational confusion or misuse
For detailed context on real-world consequences and design principles, see Section 1.5.4 (Real-World Consequences Framework).
What Does MOSIP Do?
MOSIP receives the reactivation request from CRVS, validates that the National ID was previously deactivated with a fraud flag, and routes the case to manual verification. MOSIP does NOT automatically reactivate the National ID. Instead, it:
Validates the request by confirming the UIN exists and was deactivated with
Fraud_Birth = TrueChecks time windows to ensure the request falls within policy-defined limits
Prevents duplicate requests by rejecting if a reactivation is already under review
Routes to manual verification using the same Camel workflow as deactivation
Provides context (original fraud reason, supporting documentation) to reviewers
Waits for manual decision from authorized country authorities
Executes reactivation only after manual approval
What Does CRVS Receive?
Under the current implementation:
No automatic notification is sent back to CRVS regarding reactivation status
CRVS may subscribe to WebSub for packet status updates if needed
Final reactivation status may be communicated through offline coordination
Note: The notification mechanism for reactivation scenarios is under policy review and may be enhanced based on country requirements.
What Is the Workflow?
Step 1: CRVS Request Submission
CRVS submits a reactivation request via the MOSIP packet API with the following parameters:
Required Fields:
Fraud_birth =
False(indicates reactivation request)Process =
CRVS_fraud_birthSource =
CRVS1National_ID (UIN of the individual)
Fraud_birth_reason (reason for the original deactivation)
Optional: Supporting metadata/document references
Note: Should evidence documentation be required as reference for manual review?
Step 2: Validation by MOSIP
Confirm UIN status: Verify that the UIN exists and was deactivated with
Fraud_birth = True.Reject duplicate requests: If a previous reactivation request for the same UIN is already under review, reject the new request.
Time window validation: Requests are valid only within a defined period from the initial birth registration date. Requests outside this window are automatically rejected, requiring citizens to follow offline grievance/legal processes.
Note: Should the time window be calculated from the date of initial registration or from the date of deactivation?
Optional validation: Should MOSIP-side validation for garbage values in the
fraud_birth_reason/Deactivation_reasonfield be added?If all validations pass, initiate packet processing.
Step 3: Routing to Manual Verification
Route the packet to a dedicated manual verification queue using the Camel route associated with
CRVS_fraud_birth.Include the
Fraud_birth_reasonto provide context for the country authorities' review.
Note: Where should the packet details be stored for reference during manual verification?
Step 4: Manual Verification by Authorities
Country administrators/legal authorities review the case, using the original deactivation reason and supporting documentation.
Decision Options:
Approve: Reactivate the National ID offline.
Reject: Keep the National ID deactivated. The fraud flag may be retained or cleared depending on policy.
Step 5: Logging and Audit
Store all request, validation, and verification details in MOSIP for compliance and traceability.
Ensure traceability of all actions for potential audits or legal review.
MOSIP Options and Pros/Cons
Option
Advantages
Disadvantages / Risks
Automatic Online Reactivation
Fast; reduces manual overhead
High risk of fraud; bypasses legal review; multiple toggling possible; downstream service disruption; audit challenges
Receive Request + Route to Manual Verification (Recommended)
Preserves legal and operational control; ensures traceability; allows genuine corrections
Requires administrative effort; slight delay in final resolution
Reject All Online Reactivation Requests (Offline Only)
Fully prevents misuse; simple to implement
Citizens and CRVS cannot leverage integration; delays in legitimate corrections; reduced transparency
Recommended MOSIP Policy
Accept CRVS reactivation requests only if the UIN was previously deactivated with
Fraud_birth = True.Use
Fraud_birth_reasonto reference the original deactivation during manual verification.Route flagged requests to the manual verification queue using the dedicated Camel route (
CRVS_fraud_birth).Enforce one active request per UIN: No subsequent requests are accepted until the verification is complete.
Validate time window: Requests must fall within the defined time window from the initial birth registration date. Requests outside this window are rejected, and offline grievance/legal channels must be followed.
No automatic reactivation is allowed; final decisions rest with country authorities.
Additional Considerations
Traceability
Maintaining metadata (Process, Source, and Fraud_birth_reason) ensures every reactivation request is auditable.
Operational Safety
Limiting reactivation to manual verification avoids misuse and prevents disruption to downstream authentication services.
Time Window Logic
The window for reactivation should be calculated from the initial birth registration date, consistent with the original deactivation policy.
Alignment with Global Best Practices
This workflow mirrors international practices, combining civil registration with identity management while reserving sensitive lifecycle events for human review.
Last updated
Was this helpful?